zerodha-kite

Download the script first, inspect it, verify its checksum, then run it. Do not pipe curl/wget output directly to sh/bash. Prefer package manager installs.

Likely FP if the download is from a well-known installer domain (e.g., brew.sh, rustup.rs), though this pattern is inherently risky even with trusted sources.

Download the file first, verify its integrity (checksum, signature), inspect it, then run it. Prefer package managers over raw downloads. Never fetch-and-run in one step.

Likely FP if the target is a well-known installer (e.g., rustup, Homebrew) from its canonical HTTPS domain, though the pattern is inherently risky.

Download the script first, inspect it, verify its checksum, then run it. Do not pipe curl/wget output directly to sh/bash. Prefer package manager installs.

Likely FP if the download is from a well-known installer domain (e.g., brew.sh, rustup.rs), though this pattern is inherently risky even with trusted sources.

Download the file first, verify its integrity (checksum, signature), inspect it, then run it. Prefer package managers over raw downloads. Never fetch-and-run in one step.

Likely FP if the target is a well-known installer (e.g., rustup, Homebrew) from its canonical HTTPS domain, though the pattern is inherently risky.

Download the file first, verify its integrity (checksum, signature), inspect it, then run it. Prefer package managers over raw downloads. Never fetch-and-run in one step.

Likely FP if the target is a well-known installer (e.g., rustup, Homebrew) from its canonical HTTPS domain, though the pattern is inherently risky.

Download the script first, inspect it, verify its checksum, then run it. Do not pipe curl/wget output directly to sh/bash. Prefer package manager installs.

Likely FP if the download is from a well-known installer domain (e.g., brew.sh, rustup.rs), though this pattern is inherently risky even with trusted sources.

Pin the downloaded resource to a specific version or commit hash, and verify its integrity with a checksum (SHA-256). Avoid fetching scripts or binaries from arbitrary URLs at runtime.

Likely FP if the download URL points to a well-known CDN or package registry (e.g., npmjs.com, pypi.org) and is pinned to a specific version.

Replace GitHub raw.githubusercontent.com references with pinned commit SHAs instead of branch names (e.g., /commit-sha/file instead of /main/file). Branch references are mutable.

Likely FP if the raw GitHub URL points to a versioned release tag in a well-known repository, though even tags are technically mutable.

Break chained commands into discrete, individually validated steps. Avoid piping untrusted output directly into a shell interpreter.

Likely FP if the matched text is a documentation example showing a common installer one-liner for a well-known tool with a canonical URL.

Replace GitHub raw.githubusercontent.com references with pinned commit SHAs instead of branch names (e.g., /commit-sha/file instead of /main/file). Branch references are mutable.

Likely FP if the raw GitHub URL points to a versioned release tag in a well-known repository, though even tags are technically mutable.

Break chained commands into discrete, individually validated steps. Avoid piping untrusted output directly into a shell interpreter.

Likely FP if the matched text is a documentation example showing a common installer one-liner for a well-known tool with a canonical URL.

Avoid loading configuration or behavior-controlling content from runtime URLs. Bundle required configurations locally or pin remote config to versioned, integrity-verified endpoints.

Likely FP if the URL in the match is a documentation link or example URL (e.g., example.com) rather than an actual runtime-fetched configuration endpoint.

Replace GitHub raw.githubusercontent.com references with pinned commit SHAs instead of branch names (e.g., /commit-sha/file instead of /main/file). Branch references are mutable.

Likely FP if the raw GitHub URL points to a versioned release tag in a well-known repository, though even tags are technically mutable.

Replace GitHub raw.githubusercontent.com references with pinned commit SHAs instead of branch names (e.g., /commit-sha/file instead of /main/file). Branch references are mutable.

Likely FP if the raw GitHub URL points to a versioned release tag in a well-known repository, though even tags are technically mutable.

Validate and sanitize all data received from external APIs before using it in tool operations or agent prompts. Implement schema validation and treat API responses as untrusted input.

Likely FP if the match is a truncated table cell or documentation fragment that mentions API responses in a descriptive context, not actual unvalidated data processing.

Break chained commands into discrete, individually validated steps. Avoid piping untrusted output directly into a shell interpreter.

Likely FP if the matched text is a documentation example showing a common installer one-liner for a well-known tool with a canonical URL.

Replace GitHub raw.githubusercontent.com references with pinned commit SHAs instead of branch names (e.g., /commit-sha/file instead of /main/file). Branch references are mutable.

Likely FP if the raw GitHub URL points to a versioned release tag in a well-known repository, though even tags are technically mutable.

Replace GitHub raw.githubusercontent.com references with pinned commit SHAs instead of branch names (e.g., /commit-sha/file instead of /main/file). Branch references are mutable.

Likely FP if the raw GitHub URL points to a versioned release tag in a well-known repository, though even tags are technically mutable.