celo-agent-skills

Download the file first, verify its integrity (checksum, signature), inspect it, then run it. Prefer package managers over raw downloads. Never fetch-and-run in one step.

Likely FP if the target is a well-known installer (e.g., rustup, Homebrew) from its canonical HTTPS domain, though the pattern is inherently risky.

Download the script first, inspect it, verify its checksum, then run it. Do not pipe curl/wget output directly to sh/bash. Prefer package manager installs.

Likely FP if the download is from a well-known installer domain (e.g., brew.sh, rustup.rs), though this pattern is inherently risky even with trusted sources.

Break chained commands into discrete, individually validated steps. Avoid piping untrusted output directly into a shell interpreter.

Likely FP if the matched text is a documentation example showing a common installer one-liner for a well-known tool with a canonical URL.

Replace GitHub raw.githubusercontent.com references with pinned commit SHAs instead of branch names (e.g., /commit-sha/file instead of /main/file). Branch references are mutable.

Likely FP if the raw GitHub URL points to a versioned release tag in a well-known repository, though even tags are technically mutable.

Replace GitHub raw.githubusercontent.com references with pinned commit SHAs instead of branch names (e.g., /commit-sha/file instead of /main/file). Branch references are mutable.

Likely FP if the raw GitHub URL points to a versioned release tag in a well-known repository, though even tags are technically mutable.

Replace GitHub raw.githubusercontent.com references with pinned commit SHAs instead of branch names (e.g., /commit-sha/file instead of /main/file). Branch references are mutable.

Likely FP if the raw GitHub URL points to a versioned release tag in a well-known repository, though even tags are technically mutable.

Replace GitHub raw.githubusercontent.com references with pinned commit SHAs instead of branch names (e.g., /commit-sha/file instead of /main/file). Branch references are mutable.

Likely FP if the raw GitHub URL points to a versioned release tag in a well-known repository, though even tags are technically mutable.

Replace GitHub raw.githubusercontent.com references with pinned commit SHAs instead of branch names (e.g., /commit-sha/file instead of /main/file). Branch references are mutable.

Likely FP if the raw GitHub URL points to a versioned release tag in a well-known repository, though even tags are technically mutable.

Replace GitHub raw.githubusercontent.com references with pinned commit SHAs instead of branch names (e.g., /commit-sha/file instead of /main/file). Branch references are mutable.

Likely FP if the raw GitHub URL points to a versioned release tag in a well-known repository, though even tags are technically mutable.

Replace GitHub raw.githubusercontent.com references with pinned commit SHAs instead of branch names (e.g., /commit-sha/file instead of /main/file). Branch references are mutable.

Likely FP if the raw GitHub URL points to a versioned release tag in a well-known repository, though even tags are technically mutable.

Replace GitHub raw.githubusercontent.com references with pinned commit SHAs instead of branch names (e.g., /commit-sha/file instead of /main/file). Branch references are mutable.

Likely FP if the raw GitHub URL points to a versioned release tag in a well-known repository, though even tags are technically mutable.

Replace GitHub raw.githubusercontent.com references with pinned commit SHAs instead of branch names (e.g., /commit-sha/file instead of /main/file). Branch references are mutable.

Likely FP if the raw GitHub URL points to a versioned release tag in a well-known repository, though even tags are technically mutable.

Replace GitHub raw.githubusercontent.com references with pinned commit SHAs instead of branch names (e.g., /commit-sha/file instead of /main/file). Branch references are mutable.

Likely FP if the raw GitHub URL points to a versioned release tag in a well-known repository, though even tags are technically mutable.

Replace GitHub raw.githubusercontent.com references with pinned commit SHAs instead of branch names (e.g., /commit-sha/file instead of /main/file). Branch references are mutable.

Likely FP if the raw GitHub URL points to a versioned release tag in a well-known repository, though even tags are technically mutable.

Replace GitHub raw.githubusercontent.com references with pinned commit SHAs instead of branch names (e.g., /commit-sha/file instead of /main/file). Branch references are mutable.

Likely FP if the raw GitHub URL points to a versioned release tag in a well-known repository, though even tags are technically mutable.

Replace GitHub raw.githubusercontent.com references with pinned commit SHAs instead of branch names (e.g., /commit-sha/file instead of /main/file). Branch references are mutable.

Likely FP if the raw GitHub URL points to a versioned release tag in a well-known repository, though even tags are technically mutable.

Replace GitHub raw.githubusercontent.com references with pinned commit SHAs instead of branch names (e.g., /commit-sha/file instead of /main/file). Branch references are mutable.

Likely FP if the raw GitHub URL points to a versioned release tag in a well-known repository, though even tags are technically mutable.

Replace GitHub raw.githubusercontent.com references with pinned commit SHAs instead of branch names (e.g., /commit-sha/file instead of /main/file). Branch references are mutable.

Likely FP if the raw GitHub URL points to a versioned release tag in a well-known repository, though even tags are technically mutable.